For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Overview

This page is a cross-jurisdiction index. Action detail lives under the issuing authority's enforcement folder; this page links to those records and does not duplicate the per-authority pages.

Authority

EU and national competent authorities

Jurisdiction

European Union and EU/EEA Member States

Snapshot date

2026-06-24

Coverage

Public-source desk sweep; not a live enforcement feed

All Published Actions

Authority
Jurisdiction
Action
Date
Type
Amount
Obligation area
Summary
Source

BaFin

Germany

Offshore exchange domains (6)

2024-2025

Perimeter action

n/a

Unregistered/unauthorised activity; perimeter enforcement Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Blocked access to six offshore exchange domains targeting German users without CASP authorisation.

Source

BaFin

Germany

Crypto ATM operators

Aug 2024

Perimeter action

n/a

Unauthorised activity; AML/ML risk money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Secured 13 crypto ATMs as part of a Germany-wide operation against unauthorised crypto ATM activity; BaFin's annual report cites the action and the associated money-laundering risk.

Source

CBI

Ireland

Coinbase Europe Ltd

6 Nov 2025 (settlement 5 Nov 2025; High Court confirmed 12 Jan 2026)

Fine

EUR 21,464,734

AML/CFT - transaction monitoring system configuration; STR reporting; ICT/outsourcing of transaction monitoring money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 68 MiCA

Faults in the configuration of its transaction-monitoring system left 30,442,437 transactions (EUR 176bn, approximately 31% of volume) unmonitored over a 12-month period; retrospective monitoring took almost 3 years and yielded 2,708 STRs to the FIU. Violations ran from 23 Apr 2021 to 19 Mar 2025.

Source

DNB

Netherlands

Binance

2022 (reported)

Fine

EUR 3,325,000

Unregistered activity / market entry; AML registration regime money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Operated in the Netherlands, including crypto transactions, wallets, and financial services, without the required DNB registration.

Source

DNB

Netherlands

Coinbase Europe Ltd

Decision 18 Jan 2023

Fine

EUR 3,325,000

Unregistered activity / market entry; AML registration regime money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Provided crypto services in the Netherlands without the legally required DNB registration until 22 Sep 2022 under the Dutch AML/CTF Act (Wwft).

Source

DNB

Netherlands

Crypto.com (Foris DAX)

Disclosed Mar 2024 (active in NL May 2020-Nov 2022)

Fine

EUR 2,850,000

Unregistered activity / market entry; AML registration regime money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Provided crypto services without DNB registration; base fine EUR 2M raised by EUR 850K for severity and duration. DNB's primary page is anonymised; secondary reporting identifies the provider as Crypto.com / Foris DAX.

Source

EBA

European Union

28 Jul 2025

Opinion

n/a

AML/CFT systems and controls; governance; senior-management integrity; transaction monitoring; CDD; sanctions screening; self-hosted wallets money laundering; terrorist financing; self-hosted address; ToFR Article 23; Article 68 MiCA

Opinion and report on ML/TF risks: competent authorities found CASPs often lacked effective AML/CFT systems and controls; concerns also covered senior-management integrity, governance transparency and adequacy, licensing or registration avoidance, transaction monitoring, CDD, sanctions screening, RegTech weaknesses, crypto-fiat conversion, and self-hosted wallets.

Source

EBA

European Union

4 Jul 2024

Guideline

n/a

Travel Rule; crypto transfers; missing or incomplete originator-beneficiary information; ML/TF risk factors; self-hosted wallets; restrictive-measures controls money laundering; terrorist financing; ToFR Article 14; ToFR Article 16; ToFR Article 17; self-hosted address; ToFR Article 23; Article 68 MiCA

Travel Rule guidelines specify the information accompanying crypto transfers and steps to detect missing or incomplete originator-beneficiary information; related CASP ML/TF risk-factor guidance covers blockchain analytics, anonymity-enhancing features, self-hosted wallets and decentralised platforms.

Source

ESMA

European Union

10 Jul 2025

Peer review

n/a

CASP authorisation; governance; conflicts of interest; ICT/custody; AML/CFT; DeFi/Web3 exposure money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA; Article 68 MiCA

Fast-track peer review found the MFSA partially meeting expectations on a CASP authorisation process and cited unresolved material issues, including prior and pending enforcement history, business-plan growth, conflicts, governance, ICT/custody/Web3, and AML/CFT controls.

Source

ESMA

European Union

17 Apr 2026

Statement

n/a

Transitional periods; unauthorised activity; wind-down planning; AML/CFT/KYC client migration money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Statement on the end of MiCA transitional periods: 1 Jul 2026 is the EU-wide deadline with no grace period, unauthorised CASPs need immediately executable wind-down plans, and authorised CASPs taking migrated clients must run fresh AML/CFT/KYC checks.

Source

ESMA

European Union

26 Feb 2025

Guideline

n/a

Reverse solicitation; unauthorised activity; perimeter enforcement; online and social-media marketing Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA

Guidelines read the reverse-solicitation exemption narrowly, treat broad EU-facing marketing and promotion as solicitation, require records proving exclusive client initiative, and expect NCAs to monitor online and social-media activity for EU indicators.

Source

ESMA

European Union

31 Jan 2025

Statement

n/a

CASP authorisation; ML/TF risk; governance; outsourcing; fit-and-proper; business plan; notifications money laundering; terrorist financing; Article 59 MiCA; Article 62 MiCA; Article 68 MiCA; Article 83 MiCA

Supervisory briefing on CASP authorisation: no cursory low-risk assessments, generally high ML/TF risks, and higher scrutiny for large CASPs, complex groups, governance, outsourcing, fit-and-proper, business-plan realism, and notifications.

Source

FCIS

Lithuania

Payeer UAB

10 Jul 2024

Fine

EUR 9,300,000

Sanctions / restrictive-measures compliance; AML/CFT money laundering; terrorist financing; ToFR Article 23; Article 68 MiCA

Record fine for violation of international sanctions and AML legislation.

Source

FIAU

Malta

OKCoin Europe Ltd (OKX)

1 Apr 2025 (publication notice 3 Apr 2025; on-site exam Apr 2023)

Fine

EUR 1,054,269

AML/CFT - business-wide risk assessment, transaction monitoring money laundering; terrorist financing

Administrative penalty and follow-up directive for AML/CFT control failures, including business risk assessment, customer risk assessment, ongoing monitoring and enhanced due diligence deficiencies.

Source

MFSA

Malta

OKCoin Europe Ltd (OKX)

Settled Jan 2024

Fine

EUR 304,000

Governance arrangements; conduct/regulatory compliance Article 68 MiCA

Settled investigation into failings under Article 41 of the Virtual Financial Assets Act; measures included appointment of an independent third party to review governance.

Source

Method And Coverage

This page is a cross-jurisdiction index. Action detail lives under the issuing authority's enforcement folder; this page links to those records and does not duplicate the per-authority pages.

Coverage is skewed toward headline fines, perimeter action, and EU-body supervisory publications because those signals are more visible in public sources.

Coverage Caveats

  • DNB Binance is verified against DNB's Dutch-language enforcement page; the English annual-report discussion was used only as context.

  • DNB Foris DAX / Crypto.com is published with caution: DNB's primary page confirms an anonymised crypto-service-provider fine and amount, while secondary reporting identifies the provider as Crypto.com / Foris DAX.

  • AMF Enforcement Committee fines surfaced in search, including a EUR 4,150,000 multi-respondent decision for dissemination of false/misleading information and price manipulation, were not confirmed to concern crypto-assets specifically and are excluded to avoid mis-attribution.

  • AMF crypto enforcement in 2024-2025 is predominantly perimeter/blacklist action rather than monetary sanctions on registered PSAN/CASPs.

  • No verified DNB/AFM monetary fine against Bitvavo was found.

Last updated