For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Entities who have not applied for, or whose application for authorisation as CASPs has been refused by the end of the transition period

ESMA Q&A 2221 on Entities who have not applied for, or whose application for authorisation as CASPs has been refused by the end of the transition period.

Authority

ESMA

Q&A ID

ESMA_QA_2221

Status

Answer Published

Published

4 July 2024

Legal basis

None mapped

Source

ESMA Q&A

Question

What happens to an entity providing crypto-asset services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024 that has not applied for authorisation as a CASP, or whose application for authorisation as a CASP has been refused by the end of the transition period?


Answer

Where an entity providing crypto-asset services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024 has not been authorised as a CASP by the end of the transition period applicable in the relevant Member State, it must cease providing crypto-asset services. Where such entities do not seek a MiCA authorisation, they should consider at an early stage how they will wind down their operations in a manner that avoids negative impact on their clients in accordance, if relevant, with applicable laws.


Source: ESMA original document

Last updated